This was with the big gun...
This was with my 50mm...
And this was my obligatory art shot with the 70-200, since I had it on my rig and all...
I have some stuff of a BMX nature to discuss in the next blog, so be ready.
Sunday, July 5, 2009
One of these things is not like the other...
but actually it is. Corey had a lens from work at his disposal and since we both shoot with Nikon, that meant I got to play with it a little, too. It was a Nikon 70-200mm 2.8 and it was nice and sharp. At $2,000, that means I will likely never own one, which I was lamenting a little until I took a picture with my $100 Nikon 50mm 1.8 that Mica got me for Christmas. I have to say, it was pretty damn sharp when put up against the 70-200. Check it...
This was with the big gun...
This was with my 50mm...
And this was my obligatory art shot with the 70-200, since I had it on my rig and all...
I have some stuff of a BMX nature to discuss in the next blog, so be ready.
This was with the big gun...
This was with my 50mm...
And this was my obligatory art shot with the 70-200, since I had it on my rig and all...
I have some stuff of a BMX nature to discuss in the next blog, so be ready.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
I think the $100 lens looks good, but I don't know if the other one looks $1900 better.
You need to pick your top 10 favorite photos. You should post a couple of pics you are on the fence about, and get some opinions.
I agree with Mica, if you are on the fence about any, post'em up. I'll give you the C&C.
I also agree that it doesn't look $1900 better. That's comforting, considering the Sigma is only a few hundred more than the 50. Sweet.
Also, I want to go back to the wall soon and I want to try to scrub the wall where it sticks out...I think I can get it....
You guys need to come by and check out the shelves. Maybe have a beer.
DEAD BLOG!
BLOG DEAD!
is corey really wearing stripes with plaid?
RUSTICLE PISSED!!!
Post a Comment